"Among the killed and she died alone"
If the illustrious Mr. Gianni Vattimo thinks that we have lost the notion of Actually, it sounds good, we all know that there are as many opinions that ass (the truth is that I think this is not entirely true, since 6,697,254,041 opinions can have sex, I would say, one person as the subject of which we speak). For him it is imperative bad loss, I suppose, by the amount of unknown possibilities that open meeting of this statement so revolutionary, but I love Italian philosopher to ask if he really knows how to use an iPod or gives the wii . As I do not expect an answer, I give to myself, no, Gianni does not deal with these aparatejos. The death of God was the first major death in the history of philosophy, following it, have fallen one after another in history, art ... and now I guess also the reality. Only deduce one thing from this: philosophers are murderers in the pay of the illustrious philosophical notions long established. What bothers us anything? Well we killed him.
would have no problem in killing certain disciplines that exist in the faculties of Philosophy and, meeting no more than smoke. But as there is if it comes before the chicken or the egg, I have my doubts about whether to kill the disciplines themselves, or those who teach. Because if God is dead, "What's all that stuff of metaphysics and finding the first principle of all things? It is clear that what I discuss here is just what many others already have said, for example, that if a philosophical discipline such as philosophy of mind does not maintain a relationship with neuroscience interdisciplinarity and anthropology, all we get from all this black smoke and polluted.
not advocate anything. Every time I have less say about the huge amount of things that happen in the world. Our mind is not prepared to go to a company that goes faster than it. I guess for those versed in the subject would be even unnecessary to say that this problem lies in the super-to which we have had to be productive and effective. And here is where the kill: Philosophy does not specialize in absolutely none of the things of this world. It's like a Christ on the Cross warning that the world is not of this world and being así...¿Para qué quiero yo saber nada acerca de algo que no es real? Efectivamente, Señor Gianni: hemos perdido la noción de realidad porque nos hemos alejado de las cosas que nos vienen dadas, que nos rodean, que nos facilitan o que nos complican la vida. Métase a Second Life y hágase un avatar a su medida, como más le guste. Pero deje de esconderse tras el velo de la ignorancia y de leer textos de otros autores para generar otros textos. Hace tiempo ya le pillamos el truco, Sr. Filosofastro del tres al cuarto: el único mérito que tienen sus obras son los títulos, a los que algunos tachan de provocativos. Lo que hay dentro de ellos es infumable hasta en papel de biblia. ¿Que no cree en la biblia? Ni lo se ni me among other things matter because my fierce criticism, although that is directed to you, is directed toward many other leeches, many other parasites of dusty books who believe that get a verse of Parmenides colacción light on the poor will minds of those who have not yet practiced sapere aude. Let nonsense and watch the news, come to the asylums into metallurgy, sailing the seas, a walk to the park closer to home ... whatever, but I ask you please just human love, which never explained to a beggar of those who sleep late in the CCCB (in case you do not know, is a super museum progress of Barcelona) that we lost track of reality.
I suggest also that occasional chat with a child or two or three, draw with them, allowing them to be told how to see the world. Only in this way will we stop listening to nonsense.
Very angry,
The Deli
0 comments:
Post a Comment